If you haven't been keeping up with the rather momentous news that, Yesterday, a Massachusetts District Court Judge Ruled that DOMA(the defense of marriage act) violates the U.S. constitution. On the one hand I want to offer a hearty WAHOOO!...on the other, I am saying, "well duh...haven't we been telling you this all along?".
The decision was handed down by Judge Joseph Tauro of the the U.S. District Court of the District of Massachusetts, for the cases of Gill v. Office of Personnel Management and Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Department of Health and Human Services. In his rulling, Judge Tauro explains his decision:
“indeed, Congress undertook this classification for the one purpose that lies entirely outside of legislative bounds, to disadvantage a group of which it disapproves. And such a classification, the Constitution clearly will not permit.”
This is a fabulous outcome by itself and one to celebrate. However, I was looking at this as only one step of a much larger journey up the federal court system....much like California's Perry v. Schwarzeneger will likely be. However, the story takes an ironic twist...and this is where our fierce advocate will have to show his true colors...
